Read on Substack →
Little Mountain Service Area

A District Built for No One

A water district created for zero residents, run by the same handful of landowning families for nearly two decades, became the financial pass-through for the largest development project in Weber County's history — and the people governing it were, at times, the same people benefiting from it.

UIPA Little Mountain Service Area West Weber Public Infrastructure Districts Conflicts of Interest
LMSA
Little Mountain Service Area — the sewer district this piece is about. Created 2007, still governs sewer infrastructure for the West Weber corridor today.
UIPA
Utah Inland Port Authority — the state agency that adopted the West Weber Project Area Plan in May 2024.
PCC
Promontory Commerce Center — the industrial development project inside the West Weber Project Area.
PID
Public Infrastructure District — a special taxing/bonding entity created to fund a specific development's roads, sewer, and utilities.
ARPA
American Rescue Plan Act — the federal COVID-era relief law; the source of the sewer funding described below.
I. 2007

A district with no one to answer to

The Little Mountain Service Area was created to provide sewer service to the far western edge of Weber County — agricultural land, mostly, with almost no rooftops on it. The county's own resolution creating its first board of trustees says so plainly.

Seven seats were filled that day. Two-year terms, renewable, no election required — because there was, by the county's own account, no electorate to hold one for.

WEBER
COUNTY
2007
WEBER COUNTY COMMISSION RESOLUTION 12‑2007
“Jim Adams, Randy Marriott and Ken Bischoff be appointed to 2‑year terms from January 1, 2007–December 31, 2008.”
— Weber County Commission, January 16, 2007
By the county's own record
0
Residents in this sewer service area

Not zero voters. Zero residents. A special district with taxing and infrastructure authority, governed by a board answerable to no one who lived inside its own boundary — only to the landowners who did.

The first board

Who held the seats

Landowners governing land they owned. That was, at the start, simply what the district was — a sewer utility for working farmland, run by the farmers.

Jim Adams
2-year term, appointed 1/16/2007
Randy Marriott
2-year term, appointed 1/16/2007
Served at least 17 years, until his death sometime before May 2024
Ken Bischoff
2-year term, appointed 1/16/2007
II. 2023–2024

Then, eleven months, laid end to end

For sixteen years, almost nothing about the district changed. Then, over less than a year, the state's inland port authority arrived — and Little Mountain's own trustees started showing up everywhere the money moved. Every entry below is a dated action from the county's own record.

MAR 4
2023

Two survey plats signed for the PID districts that don't exist yet

Surveyor Brian F. Mitchell
A 357-acre master annexation plat, 18 parcels — three months before the districts themselves were formally created. Wadeland Land LLC confirmed as owner of at least 5 of those parcels.
JUN 13–27
2023

Notice creating Promontory Commerce Center PID Districts 1, 2, 3

Weber County Commission
Combined debt limit: $150 million. Consent to creation was already obtained from every property owner before the public hearing — meaning no one left who could actually contest it.
AUG
2023

Weber County Commission passes its first resolution consenting to a UIPA project area

Weber County Commission · ~903 acres
The original, much smaller footprint. What would later become 9,000 acres started here.
SEP
2023

Land-buying begins in the expanded footprint

PCC Land LLC / Gardner Group
Purchases recorded the month after the original, smaller resolution passed — before the county had even voted to expand it.
JAN 2
2024

The 9,000-acre expansion

Weber County Commission (Froerer, Bolos, Harvey)
The West Weber Project Area grows roughly tenfold. Of 20 public commenters, 19 were opposed.
JAN 8
2024

990-acre wetland delineation approved

Army Corps of Engineers / UIPA
A delineation, not a fill permit — the first direct federal touchpoint on a specific parcel in the project area.
MAY 20
2024

UIPA adopts the West Weber Project Area Plan — and approves PCC Land LLC's development agreement, same meeting

UIPA Board · Resolution 2024-09
A resident formally asked the board, in writing, whether it had any relationship with a lobbying network tied to the project. The board's own minutes required future differential funds be spent on "public infrastructure — road, sewer, water."
JUN 25
2024

Two things happen at the same Weber County Commission meeting

Weber County Commission · Stephanie Russell presenting
The county approves the agreement routing Little Mountain's ARPA sewer money to the port's own infrastructure — and appoints a developer to Little Mountain's board of trustees.
June 25, 2024

The pivot

Eleven months after the county's first quiet resolution, the county's own Economic Development Director stood up and explained, on the record, exactly where Little Mountain's leftover federal sewer money was going.

“This contract will outline the details of the ARPA funding for the Sewer Lagoon Improvement System and the Wastewater Improvement System in west Weber… Any remaining funds from the LMSA Lagoon Rehabilitation effort will be sent to this program, with the County acting as pass-through for those funds.”
— Stephanie Russell, Weber County Commission meeting, June 25, 2024

At that same meeting, on the same agenda, the county appointed a developer — a man who would, twenty days later, propose that Little Mountain take over his own subdivision's sewer system — to the board governing the district whose money Russell had just described.

III. Stephanie Russell

Three roles, one person, at the same moment

At that June 25, 2024 meeting, Stephanie Russell held three distinct roles at once — the person deciding where the money went, the person running the district that had it, and a person paid by that district to represent its interests in the room.

01

County Official

Weber County Economic Development Director. Presented and got approved the agreement moving Little Mountain's ARPA funds to the port's own infrastructure.

02

District Manager

Little Mountain's own formal Manager — an officer title, not merely staff. The district's public contact listing routes to her private email, not a county address.

03

Paid Lobbyist

Registered September 18, 2024 to lobby on Little Mountain's behalf — through a company she personally owns. Little Mountain is her only listed client.

ONE PERSON  ·  THREE SEPARATE, SIMULTANEOUS ROLES
The lobbyist registration

Registered to lobby for the district she manages

Utah requires anyone paid to influence government decisions on behalf of a client to register as a lobbyist. Russell's own filing names her private company — not a law firm, not an outside consultancy — as the vehicle, and names Little Mountain as the client.

UTAH LOBBYIST REGISTRATIONFILED 9/18/2024
Registrant
Stephanie Sage Russell
Business
Sage Development Group
Entity type
Assumed Name (DBA) — not an LLC
Sole owner
Stephanie Sage Russell
Listed client
Little Mountain Service Area (her only one)
Address on file
611 Plum Creek Ln, Ogden

Little Mountain's own public listing gives its official contact as this same private email — not a county address — routed through the county's own building at 2380 Washington Blvd.

$184,955.53
2025 PAY, "DIVISION DIRECTOR — ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT"
119% above the average Weber County co-worker (third-party payroll data, not primary-source confirmed)
+1
ADDITIONAL JOB LISTED, TITLE NOT IDENTIFIED
Shown on the same aggregator record, unresolved
IV. Pat Burns

The developer appointed the same day

Right alongside the vote routing Little Mountain's ARPA money toward the Promontory Commerce Center, the Weber County Commission made a second decision that day: who would sit on Little Mountain's own board.

WEBER COUNTY COMMISSIONRESOLUTION 34-2024
Action
Appoints trustee to Little Mountain Service Area board
Appointed
Pat Burns
Replacing
Craig Jackson
Date
June 25, 2024
Who Pat Burns is

A developer with three footprints in the same corridor

Burns wasn't a stranger to west Weber County land use before this appointment. His name was already attached to a construction company, a rezoning fight, and a financing district built on the same tools Little Mountain now touches.

A

Lync Construction LLC

Owns the company (with Tracy Teeples, formed October 2015) behind a "Burns Plain City" project that went before the Plain City Planning Commission in 2021, during Mayor Jon Beesley's tenure. A tip alleges Beesley was personally employed by Lync/Burns at the time — not independently corroborated beyond that tip, though Beesley's own 2021 conflict-of-interest disclosure has a blank field where his employer should be listed.

Construction
B

West Creek Subdivision

The developer behind a Weber County rezone from agricultural to residential (R1-15) — the same period the county was standing up the infrastructure-financing tools that would later touch his own land.

Rezoning
C

Sage Creek Infrastructure Financing District

Listed as the contact sponsor — tying him to a separate statewide network of infrastructure financing districts used on other large Utah developments.

Financing
The work session that followed
20
days after joining Little Mountain's board

He proposed the district take over his own sewer

“Pat Burns also discussed his plans for the sewer. His company will be funding the building of the sewer infrastructure with the assumption that LSMA or Central Weber Sewer will take it over.”
— Weber County Work Session, July 15, 2024

His company would front the construction cost for his own subdivision's sewer system — on the assumption that the public district he'd just joined would take over ownership and maintenance once it was built.

March 11, 2025

Annexing his own land, no hearing required

Utah law waives the normal public-hearing requirement for annexation into a special district when the petitioner is the landowner. Nine months after joining Little Mountain's board, Burns's own company used exactly that provision — on land in the district he now helped govern.

Resolution 03112025-1

"Longhorn I Property"

Parcels 100360066 & 101770017
Resolution 03112025-2

"Longhorn II Property"

Parcel 100360043

Both petitions were filed by Burns on behalf of his own company. Because he was the property owner, no public hearing was legally required for either one to be annexed into the district whose board he sat on.

V. Why It Matters

Who actually gets a say

Utah law waives the public-hearing requirement for a special-district annexation when the person asking is the only property owner affected. On paper, that makes sense — if you own land and nobody else does, there's no one else to hear from.

But that rule assumes the person asking is an ordinary landowner, not someone who already sits on the board deciding whether to say yes. When the petitioner and the decision-maker are the same person, the "no one else to hear from" logic breaks down — the one person whose voice matters most is also the one voice the process was built to check.

The public doesn't get a vote on Little Mountain's board. It never has — the district was built for a place with no residents, and residency is still not how a seat is earned. What the public gets, in theory, is the hearing: the moment where a decision affecting shared infrastructure has to be explained out loud, in public, before it's final. That's the mechanism that's absent here, twice, for the same board member's own land.

None of this required breaking a rule. That's arguably the more uncomfortable version of the story: a district that was already structurally insulated from public input used a second, entirely legal shortcut to remove the one moment of public input that remained.